A growing library of 3,589 user flow videos from proven products.
Need an MVP like Page Flows?
We'll build it in less than 7 days. Book a free discovery call with Tiny Startup Studio.
Book free discovery call →Page Flows is the user flow video library showing actual user journeys through 200+ top apps via video recordings. Distinguished from screen-based inspiration sources (Mobbin captures screen-by-screen, Dribbble shows aesthetic shots) by video format showing complete user flows with all interactions, transitions, motion, and micro-interactions visible. For UX designers + product managers + design teams researching interactive design + flow patterns, occupies a unique niche the screens-only sources cannot serve. Core features: video flow recordings of actual user journeys through 200+ apps, complete flow coverage (full sign-up, checkout, onboarding sequences not isolated screens), pattern-based organization (onboarding, paywall, checkout, search, etc.), industry categorization for sector-specific research, search + filtering by keyword + category + pattern, speed controls to slow down or speed up videos for specific moment study, frame-by-frame pause + step through for detailed interaction analysis, mobile + web app multi-platform coverage, recent updates as apps change major features, annotated flows with design analysis highlighting key decisions, comments + community insights discussion, save favorite flows in collections, download capability for offline study on paid tier, multiple device frames (iPhone, Android, web), high-quality clean recordings without UI artifacts, voice-over analysis on some flows explaining design decisions. Best for motion + interaction design research seeing actual transitions + micro-interactions, comprehensive onboarding flow design study vs static screens, checkout + conversion flow analysis seeing pacing + user attention, specific pattern research (paywalls, sign-up flows, search flows), industry-specific motion patterns in your category, design system interaction reference for component animation, stakeholder communication via flow videos vs abstract descriptions, onboarding workshop materials for design education, edge case interaction patterns (error/empty/loading states in motion), pre-build user testing seeing how successful apps designed similar flows. Pricing: Free tier (limited access, evaluation), Pro typically $20-$40/month (full library + downloads + advanced features — standard designer tier), Team higher tier (design workspaces + collaboration). Direct competitors: Mobbin ($19/month, screens-based with 1500+ apps + 350K+ screens, larger library but static format), Refero (similar app screen library), UI Sources (UI patterns library), Cosmos (web inspiration), Dribbble (broader design inspiration with shots), Awwwards (elite web design), screen recording aggregators in general, App Store + Google Play preview videos (free but limited). Page Flows wins on video format uniqueness + complete flow coverage + motion/interaction research depth; Mobbin wins on larger static library + faster browsing + lower price for screen-based research; Dribbble wins on community + broader inspiration; both Page Flows + Mobbin commonly used together by serious design teams for complementary research formats.
⏱ 30-second verdict
A growing library of 3,589 user flow videos from proven products.
Motion + interaction design research
See actual transitions + micro-interactions in successful apps. Static screens can't capture this dimension.
Complete onboarding flow study
Comprehensive onboarding videos vs static screens. See pacing, transitions, user attention guidance.
Checkout + conversion flow analysis
See how successful apps handle conversion specifically. Motion + micro-interactions + pacing visible.
Stakeholder design direction
Show flow videos for design discussions. Dramatically more communicative than static references.
Page Flows is the user flow video library showing actual user journeys through top apps, distinguished from screen-based inspiration sources (Mobbin) by capturing actual videos of real user flows from onboarding to checkout to advanced workflows. The pitch is direct: static screenshots show what apps look like but not how they actually work — interactions, transitions, motion, micro-interactions, the actual feel of using the product. Page Flows records actual user journeys through 200+ top apps, creating a video library where designers + product managers can watch how successful apps handle specific user flows. For UX designers + product managers + design teams researching interactive design + flow patterns, Page Flows occupies a unique niche. What makes Page Flows distinctive vs Mobbin + Dribbble is the video-based recording + actual interaction capture + flow completeness. Mobbin shows screen-by-screen captures with metadata; Page Flows shows complete video recordings of a user actually moving through the flow with all interactions visible. For motion design + micro-interactions + transition design + understanding actual product feel, video format is dramatically more useful than static screenshots. The complete-flow approach (sign-up start to user activation, not just isolated screens) reveals decisions screens-only sources miss. The core feature set: • **Video flow recordings** — actual user journey videos through 200+ apps • **Complete flow coverage** — full sign-up, checkout, onboarding, etc. (not isolated screens) • **Pattern-based organization** — find flows by pattern (onboarding, paywall, checkout, search, etc.) • **Industry categorization** — by app category for industry-specific research • **Search + filtering** — keyword + category + pattern filtering • **Speed controls** — slow down or speed up videos to study specific moments • **Frame-by-frame** — pause + step through interactions in detail • **Mobile + web app coverage** — multi-platform recording • **Recent updates** — new flows + updated flows when apps change major features • **Annotated flows** — design analysis on key flows highlighting design decisions • **Comments + insights** — design community discussion on flows • **Save favorite flows** — collection for project reference • **Download capability** — save flows for offline study (paid tier) • **Multiple device frames** — iPhone, Android, web showing platform-specific differences • **High-quality recordings** — clean recordings without UI artifacts • **Voice-over analysis** — some flows include narration explaining design decisions For UX designers + product managers + designers researching motion + interaction the use cases: • **Motion + interaction design research** — see actual transitions + micro-interactions in successful apps • **Onboarding flow design** — comprehensive onboarding videos vs static screens • **Checkout + conversion flow study** — see how successful apps handle conversion specifically • **Specific pattern research** — paywall flows, sign-up flows, search flows, etc. • **Industry-specific motion patterns** — see how leading apps in your category handle interaction • **Design system interaction reference** — how components animate + transition in production • **Stakeholder communication** — show flow videos for design direction discussions vs abstract descriptions • **Onboarding workshop materials** — using flow videos in design education + training • **Edge case interaction patterns** — error states, empty states, loading states in motion • **Pre-build user testing** — see how successful apps designed similar flows before building yours The pricing is subscription-based for the focused video library. Free tier covers limited flow access (useful for evaluation). Pro tier (typically $20-$40/month range — verify current) unlocks full library access + downloads + advanced features. Team tier for design team workspaces + collaboration. Compared to Mobbin ($19/month screens-based) and free design inspiration sources, Page Flows' video format provides unique value at competitive pricing within the design research category. Many design teams subscribe to both Mobbin + Page Flows for complementary research formats. Where Page Flows wins clearly: video format is uniquely useful for motion design + interactions + micro-interactions vs static screens; complete flow recordings show user journey decisions screens-only sources miss; for motion-conscious design teams, the format provides research that doesn't exist elsewhere; complete flow analysis from sign-up start to feature activation reveals patterns isolated screens hide; for stakeholder conversations, video flows are dramatically more communicative than static references. Where it loses: smaller library than Mobbin's 1500+ apps + 350K+ screens (videos are higher-effort to produce + maintain); subscription pricing on top of other inspiration sources (cumulative tool cost); for users researching primarily static design + visual patterns, Mobbin or Dribbble cover broader use cases; some flows may be outdated as apps evolve faster than Page Flows can re-record; for industries beyond Page Flows' primary coverage, library depth may be thinner. My take: for UX designers + product managers + design teams researching motion design + interaction patterns + complete flow design — Page Flows is genuinely the right call and the video format provides research that doesn't exist elsewhere. For motion + interaction-conscious design work, the productivity gain vs trying to assemble interaction understanding from static sources is real. For pure visual design research without interaction focus, Mobbin's larger library + static format may be more efficient. Many serious design teams use both — Mobbin for visual + static pattern research, Page Flows for motion + interaction + complete flow research. The two are complementary rather than competing. Page Flows' specific niche — video-based actual user flow recordings — is well-served + valuable for the right design research use cases.
Free
Pro
Team
Different formats. Mobbin shows screen-by-screen static captures organized by pattern. Page Flows shows actual video recordings of user journeys through complete flows. For motion design + interactions + micro-interactions, Page Flows. For static visual patterns + faster browsing, Mobbin. Many design teams use both for complementary research formats.
Free tier covers limited flow access (useful for evaluation). Pro tier (typically $20-$40/month range) unlocks full library + downloads + advanced features. For active design research, Pro tier pays for itself in time savings vs trying to recreate interaction understanding from static sources.
Motion design, transitions, micro-interactions, animations — these don't translate to static screenshots. For interaction-conscious design + understanding how successful apps actually feel + work, video captures information static screens cannot. For pure visual design (typography, color, layout, components), static screens are equivalent. Choose format based on what you're researching.
Updates depend on apps adding new features + Page Flows team re-recording. Major flow updates from popular apps captured within reasonable timeframes. Some older flows may show outdated UI as apps evolve faster than re-recording cadence. For 2026, generally representative of current state of motion design across covered apps.
Yes for product managers + design researchers + UX strategy work + competitive analysis. The video format makes interaction patterns visible to non-designers who might struggle to interpret static designs. Particularly useful for stakeholder communication ('show, don't tell' for design direction).
No reviews yet — be the first.
Figma
The browser-based design tool everyone uses.
Webflow
No-code site builder that produces real CSS.
Yellow Images
The Largest Collection of PSD Mockups on the Internet!
Wise
The design system of Wise.
Who Can Use
A tool to show how color contrast can affect different people with visual impairments.
Websitevice
Website design examples for inspiration that get results instead of awards