Visual automation platform to connect apps and build powerful workflows.
Need an MVP like Make?
We'll build it in less than 7 days. Book a free discovery call with Tiny Startup Studio.
Book free discovery call →Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform founded in 2012 by Patrik Šimek in Prague, Czech Republic. Acquired by Celonis in 2020 and rebranded from Integromat to Make in 2022. It's positioned as the more powerful, cheaper alternative to Zapier, with a visual flowchart editor instead of Zapier's linear step list. Core features: visual scenario builder with branching, loops, error handlers, and iterators; 1,500+ app integrations; OpenAI and Anthropic native nodes; webhooks unlimited; data store for cross-scenario state; team workspaces. Best for power users building complex automations, founders who've outgrown Zapier's pricing or linear flow model, and any team doing serious workflow automation at scale. Free tier covers 1,000 operations/month and 2 active scenarios; Core $9/month for 10K operations, Pro $16/month, Teams $29/user/month. Direct competitors: Zapier (6,000+ integrations, simpler linear flows, more expensive), n8n (open-source self-hostable, way cheaper at scale), Pipedream (developer-focused, code-friendly), Microsoft Power Automate (Microsoft 365 bundled), Workato (enterprise platform), Tray.io (enterprise-focused). Make wins on price + visual editor + flow control; Zapier wins on integration breadth + brand familiarity; n8n wins on self-hosting + price at scale.
⏱ 30-second verdict
Make (formerly Integromat) lets you visually design, build, and automate workflows by connecting thousands of apps and services. Create complex multi-step scenarios with conditional logic, data transformation, and error handling—all through a drag-and-drop interface that shows your automation flow in real-time.
🎯 Why it's useful
Founders can automate repetitive tasks like syncing leads between CRM and email tools, processing form submissions, or triggering Slack alerts from various data sources—saving hours of manual work weekly.
💜 Our take
The visual builder is genuinely intuitive and handles way more complexity than Zapier at a fraction of the cost. You can see exactly how data flows through each step, making debugging a breeze.
Multi-step app automations
Build flowcharts connecting 5+ SaaS tools with proper logic, loops, and error handling. Beats Zapier on workflows beyond linear A→B→C.
Cheaper Zapier alternative
At 10K+ tasks/month, Make is meaningfully cheaper than Zapier. The pricing model rewards higher volumes.
Loops + batch processing
Iterate over arrays, aggregate results, branch conditionally. The kind of automation that requires 'use Code Step' in Zapier is native in Make.
AI + LLM workflows
Make has native OpenAI and Anthropic nodes. Chain LLM calls with data lookups and writes. Better than Zapier for AI-heavy automations.
Make is what you graduate to when Zapier's pricing starts hurting and you realise you want a visual workflow editor instead of a list of steps. Acquired by Celonis in 2020, the product has continued evolving and is now genuinely better than Zapier for power users — cheaper, more capable, and the visual flowchart UI makes complex workflows much easier to reason about. The core experience: build automations as visual flowcharts. Trigger nodes (when X happens), action nodes (do Y), router nodes (branch based on conditions), iterator nodes (loop over arrays), aggregator nodes (combine results). The visual representation makes 5-step workflows feel like flowcharts you'd actually draw on a whiteboard, instead of Zapier's linear 'step 1 → step 2 → step 3' approach. For founders Make beats Zapier on a few specific axes. Pricing is cheaper at scale — Make's 'operations' are roughly equivalent to Zapier's 'tasks' but priced lower (Make's Pro plan at $16/month gives you 10K operations vs Zapier Professional's 750 tasks at $20). Workflows can be more complex (proper looping, error handling, multi-path branching) without the 'use Code Steps' workarounds Zapier requires. And the visual editor is genuinely easier for non-trivial automations. Where Make trails Zapier: integration breadth. Zapier has 6,000+ app integrations; Make has 1,500+. For most common SaaS tools you'll find both. For niche or new tools, Zapier is more likely to have native integration. Make also has a steeper learning curve — the visual editor is more powerful but takes longer to master than Zapier's linear flow. The pricing model is honest. Free tier supports 1K operations/month and 2 active scenarios — useful to evaluate. Core at $9/month and Pro at $16/month cover most small-team needs. Teams at $29/user/month adds team features. The price-per-operation scales linearly, which is more predictable than Zapier's task tiering. My take: try Make if you're paying Zapier $200+/month or you've outgrown Zapier's linear flow for complex automations. The visual editor + cheaper operations + more powerful flow control are real wins. Stay on Zapier if you (a) need a specific niche integration Make doesn't have, (b) your automations are simple enough that the linear flow is fine, or (c) you have non-technical operators who'd struggle with the visual editor. For most founders building serious automations, Make is now the better tool.
Free
Core
Pro
Teams
Free 1,000 ops/mo · Core $9/mo · Pro $16/mo · Teams $29/mo
Yes. The free tier supports 1,000 operations/month and 2 active scenarios. Useful for simple automations or evaluation. Core at $9/month and Pro at $16/month are the real entry points for serious use.
Make for cheaper pricing at scale, more powerful flow control (loops, error handling, multi-path branching), and a visual editor that's better for complex workflows. Zapier for the largest integration ecosystem (6,000+ apps) and simpler linear flows. Make wins on price + power; Zapier wins on integrations + simplicity.
Make for hosted convenience with a generous free tier. n8n for open-source self-hosting (free for self-hosted, way cheaper at high operation volumes) and code-friendly node customisation. n8n wins for teams with DevOps capacity wanting to escape any task pricing.
One unit of work in a scenario. Each action node execution = 1 operation. A scenario with 5 nodes that runs once = 5 operations. A loop iterating 100 times through 3 actions = 300 operations. Plan operation budgets carefully — exceeding the limit pauses scenarios until next billing cycle.
Manually, yes. There's no direct importer, but most Zaps translate to Make scenarios in 30 minutes per automation. The visual representation often surfaces issues with your existing Zaps (race conditions, missing error handling) that you can fix during migration.

No reviews yet — be the first.